Nevíte-li si rady s jakýmkoliv matematickým problémem, toto místo je pro vás jako dělané.
Nástěnka
❗22. 8. 2021 (L) Přecházíme zpět na doménu forum.matweb.cz!
❗04.11.2016 (Jel.) Čtete, prosím, před vložení dotazu, děkuji!
❗23.10.2013 (Jel.) Zkuste před zadáním dotazu použít některý z online-nástrojů, konzultovat použití můžete v sekci CAS.
Nejste přihlášen(a). Přihlásit
Stránky: 1

Let
and
are the roots of the equation
and
and
are the roots of the equation
. Then find
(i) 
(ii) value of 
Where
are Distinct Real numbers
Offline
Offline
Hi ↑ Sulfan:,
I have the other solutions
For example:
. In that case
and two equations become 
I shall develop my solution when I shall more have time
Offline

↑ vanok:
Hi, four zeros are not distinct real numbers :-). I think that Sulfan has found all solutions.
Offline
↑ Pavel Brožek:
Hi, you're right, in fact there are 4 possible solutions as I mentioned.
Except Vanok's
also
, but I understood under the term distinct numbers, that there shouldn't be any same pair of numbers.
Offline

↑ Sulfan:
I think that the solutions with not distinct real numbers are
and
.
Edit: You didn't use Vieta's formulas correctly – the absolute term in quadratic equation is product of the roots without a minus sign.
Offline

Thanks to all,
but anyone explain me how can i get 
Thanks
Offline
↑ stuart clark: By solving the system of equation as an immediate result of Vieta's formula.
Offline
Hi,
Finally, I have again the INTERNET connection
According to me, it is not enough to give answers without justification, but it is necessary to justify them.
Indeed, the solution that I quoted has ↑ Sulfan: do not answer at the request of ↑ stuart clark:, however to be able to answer his question, it seems to me to analyze, the problem in the possible more general case and then, to indicate solutions which he wishes to see.
On the other hand, I notice that the solution of ↑ Sulfan:, was revised with Viète's correct relations
However his solutions do not verify are not still right.
Then, I give here my analysis of this problem.
I am anxious to specify, that all the results are not obtained by equivalences so it is indispensable to verify that the solutions obtained verify the equations initially composed.(cf.↑ stuart clark:)
After this introduction, here is my attempt of solution of this problem (to criticize if need be)
Viète's relations of 2 equations are:
Where from we obtain:
product
and
where still
What gives us following three cases
or
or 
1° If
Viète's relations become
Finally
2° The symmetric case
also looks 
A remark, the cases
and
give too 
Remark:The solution
give
and two equation are
Let us suppose henceforth that 
3°
give


Finally (provided that
is effectively a root not zero of the initial equation)
…………………………..
give

and 

The first equation ↑ stuart clark: given has for root
, so
, what give thanks to 

Also, the second equation ↑ stuart clark:given has for root
, so
what give thanks to 

-
give,
Where from
So we have to examine 2 cases
1° 
et
2°

Study of case 1°
, give with
that 
For
Viète's relations become
What drives to a contradiction.
For
Viète's relations become
What gives:
And in that case there both equations of departure become
and
Study of case 2°

with

show that has
are solutions of the equation
Thus
Viète's relations :
allow to express
corresponding
But we obtain a contradiction with 
CONCLUSION:
The problem admits only two solutions in \mathbb{R^4},
1)
with
and two equation are
and
2)
and in that case there both equations of departure become
with
and anybody which satisfied by the announced requirements.
Offline
Stránky: 1